I like clear-cut winners as much as the next person, but when it comes to Bluehost vs Heroku, it would be silly for me to pick one for you. Why? Because, although you can technically host websites with both BlueHost and Heroku, the two companies specialize in very different things. The first strives to provide a straightforward hosting plan that all people can use to run a website, while the second focuses on app creation and hosting, which is an entirely different kettle of fish.
As I was saying, you can theoretically use Heroku to host a static website, but you have no incentive to do so. In this respect, BlueHost is a much better service. It’s affordable, it comes with a free domain, and it’s one of the most beginner-friendly hosting providers out there. It doesn’t exactly offer the fastest website speed, but it’s well above the market average both in terms of page loading time and uptime.
Meanwhile, if you ask me whether BlueHost or Heroku is the better choice to host an app, I would definitely go with the second. You can use BlueHost’s AppMachine to create and publish an app on the Internet, but this feature is only suitable for lightweight apps at best.
Heroku, on the other hand, allows you to create and publish a small app for free. They have an unmatched list of integrations, support a wide range of languages, and offer to do the heavy lifting for you in terms of updates and maintenance. Furthermore, if you eventually decide to scale your app, Heroku gives you options. You have to pay for them, of course, but they are easy to implement and can effectively keep up with the growth of your app.
|Pricing||from $2.95/month||from $7/month|
|1 Click WordPress Install||Yes||No|
|24/7 Support||Yes||Business Hour Support|
|Owner||Endurance International Group (EIG)||Salesforce.com|
|Ideal for||Small to Medium Enterprise||Developers and App Creators|
BlueHost vs Heroku Conclusion
The bottom line is that settling the Heroku vs BlueHost dispute is all about what you need. If you want to create and host and app, we recommend the former. Otherwise, BlueHost is the better choice.