BlueHost vs. WebHostingHub might be a tight race on paper, but things look quite different in practice. Although WHH greatly simplifies the range of options you have when going online with just three plans to choose from, the company focuses entirely on all-in-one shared hosting.
If you’re looking for VPS or dedicated hosting, there’s no way to compare between BlueHost and WebHostingHub, since the latter does not give you these options. This is not necessarily bad, since it is entirely dependent on your needs as an individual or enterprise. For those who are expanding their operations and, as a result, their web services, WebHostingHub vs. BlueHost is a clear and easy choice.
This is increasingly shaping up to be a competition between a one-hit-wonder and a group like AC/DC or The Who. WHH’s all-in-one plans, 90 days money-back guarantee and on-boarding aid are certainly attractive, but are they enough to convince me to switch my playlist from the reliable and scalable infrastructure of BlueHost? Scroll down to find out if BlueHost or WebHostingHub will be the main act of the night.
|Pricing||from $2.95/month||from $2.99/month|
|1 Click WordPress Install||Yes||Yes|
|Ideal for||Small to Medium Enterprise||Small to Medium-sized Websites|
BlueHost vs WebHostingHub Conclusion
As can be seen from the point-by-point comparison, WebHostingHub’s offers are not as attractive as the number one web hosting service recommended by WordPress. Aside from a wider range of plans to choose from, BlueHost’s individual subscriptions have fewer resource limitations than those of WWH. More importantly, BlueHost websites seem to have, on average, faster loading speeds. Responsiveness is paramount, especially if you’re in the business of eCommerce.