Before I dive into my comparison of BlueHost vs Hostinger, I have to mention that both of these services focus on shared hosting. In addition, while neither of them qualifies as a premium hosting provider, BlueHost and Hostinger are some of the most affordable options out there, which makes them both ideal for beginners.
Whether you go with BlueHost or Hostinger, you get unlimited data transfer and storage, as well as unlimited e-mails and the ability to host multiple domains. The difference between the two is that, while Hostinger is cheaper in terms of discounted prices, BlueHost offers more flexibility and better scaling options in the long run.
Unlike Hostinger, BlueHost provides dedicated hosting (with some plans) and a variety of optimizations for WordPress and WooCommerce users, to name a few. Thanks to its modern infrastructure and its use of SSD servers, Hostinger tends to score better website loading speeds, but this cannot make up for a general lack of flexibility in hosting plans.
Then there’s the thorny issue of customer support. Although both companies offer competent 24/7 support, there is no way to get in touch with a representative from Hostinger by phone, which can become a problem for some customers.
|Pricing||from $2.95/month||from $3.49/month|
|Ideal for||Small to Medium Enterprise||Bloggers and Tech Savvy|
Hostinger vs Bluehost Conclusion
All in all, if I were to choose between Hostinger vs BlueHost as a beginner looking to spend as little as possible on hosting services, I might go with the former. On the other hand, if I planned to integrate my website with WordPress and/or e-commerce applications and eventually scale to a better hosting plan, I would definitely go with BlueHost, instead.