Independent Review Submission Program
At MamboServer.com, we’re committed to providing detailed, unbiased, and expert-driven reviews of web hosting and game server hosting providers. Our Independent Review Program welcomes comprehensive reviews from industry professionals, experienced users, and technical writers who want to share their in-depth analysis with our community.
Why Contribute Reviews to MamboServer?
Writing for MamboServer.com offers several advantages. Your review will reach thousands of monthly visitors including website administrators, game server operators, business owners, developers, and gaming communities actively researching hosting solutions.
As a contributor, you’ll establish your authority in the hosting space, building credibility through bylined articles that showcase your technical expertise. Most importantly, your insights help others avoid costly mistakes and find the perfect hosting solution for their needs.
Who Can Submit Reviews
We accept submissions from IT professionals with hands-on hosting experience, technical writers specializing in web infrastructure, system administrators managing production environments, gaming community leaders running active servers, freelance researchers with proven testing methodologies, and industry consultants with deep market knowledge.
The key requirement is demonstrable expertise and actual experience with the services being reviewed. We value contributors who can provide technical depth while maintaining readability for our diverse audience.
Review Requirements
Submitted reviews must be based on genuine, extensive testing of the hosting service. We require minimum testing periods to ensure comprehensive evaluation:
| Service Type | Minimum Testing Period | Required Documentation |
|---|---|---|
| Web Hosting | 30 days | Uptime logs speed tests support interactions |
| Game Servers | 14 days | Player capacity tests latency data mod compatibility |
| VPS/Dedicated | 21 days | Resource monitoring benchmark results scalability tests |
Content must be completely original and not published elsewhere. We verify all submissions for authenticity and will reject any plagiarized or AI-generated content. If you have any affiliation with the reviewed company, this must be disclosed upfront. We maintain strict standards for unbiased analysis.
Content Structure Guidelines
While we don’t enforce a rigid template, successful reviews typically follow a logical flow. Begin with an executive summary capturing key findings and recommendations. Provide relevant background on the hosting provider, including their market position, history, and target audience.
The technical analysis should form the core of your review, covering infrastructure quality, performance metrics, security measures, and scalability options. For web hosting reviews, include tests of different CMS platforms, database performance, and email functionality. Game server reviews should address mod support, player capacity handling, and latency measurements across different regions.
User experience evaluation is equally important. Document the signup process, control panel usability, documentation quality, and support responsiveness. Include specific examples of support interactions and problem resolution times. Cost analysis should go beyond listed prices to examine value proposition, hidden fees, and comparison with market alternatives.
Your review should demonstrate technical competence through performance benchmarking, uptime monitoring data, support interaction logs, and detailed feature testing. Screenshots, data tables, and comparison charts strengthen your submission and provide valuable visual evidence for readers.
Submission Standards
Reviews must be substantial and comprehensive, typically ranging from 2,000 to 5,000 words. Structure your content with clear headings and subheadings for easy navigation. Write in accessible language that serves both technical and non-technical readers while maintaining accuracy.
All claims must be verifiable and supported by evidence. Include specific version numbers, test dates, and configuration details where relevant. We expect professional writing quality with proper grammar, logical flow, and engaging prose that keeps readers informed and interested.
Editorial Review Process
Once submitted, your review enters our editorial verification process. Our team fact-checks all technical claims and may request additional documentation or clarification. We verify uptime statistics, performance benchmarks, and pricing information against current data.
We may suggest editorial improvements for clarity, structure, or comprehensiveness. Our goal is collaborative refinement while maintaining your authentic voice and findings. The verification process typically takes 2-5 business days, depending on review complexity.
Submission Process
Begin by sending a review proposal to reviews@mamboserver.com with “Independent Review Submission” in the subject line. Include:
- Company name and service type
- Your testing methodology overview
- Relevant credentials or experience
- Expected submission timeline
- Any potential conflicts of interest
Upon proposal acceptance, submit your complete review as a Google Doc or Word file along with all supporting materials, including performance data, screenshots, testing documentation, and any relevant video demonstrations.
Our editorial team will review your submission and provide feedback within 5 business days. Once all editorial requirements are met and verification is complete, we’ll schedule publication and notify you when your review goes live.
Ethical Guidelines
All reviewers must maintain complete independence from reviewed companies during the testing and writing process. Accept no compensation, free services, or special treatment from hosting providers. Base all findings on standard customer experiences. Disclose any potential conflicts of interest immediately.
We reserve the right to reject or remove reviews that violate these ethical standards. Our readers trust us to provide unbiased information, and we take this responsibility seriously.