When we set out to compare SiteGround vs FastComet, we didn’t know what to expect. However, after spending some time reviewing both of these web hosting companies, we are confident making a recommendation to you.
Many factors go into selecting a web host, and it’s not an easy decision to make by any means. The consequences of choosing the wrong hosting platform can cost you far more than money.
If your website does not function properly, it’s nothing more than an information page floating in cyberspace that brings no value to your business. As a result, traffic declines, and your business suffers.
Both SiteGround and FastComet are leading web hosts, so which one is the better service? We decided to give you the edge you need to remain competitive in the online marketplace. We reviewed FastComet vs SiteGround and compared all of the features, functionality, and pricing with both of these companies.
If you don’t want to bother with the details, you can skip to the conclusion here.
When starting our comparison of SiteGround and FastComet, we looked at the price comparison between the subscriptions on offer from the two companies.
SiteGround offers a range of plans to suit the budget of any business. The company offers packages tailored to price points for light or heavy users. Whether you’re a blogger that’s starting their career, or an e-commerce website attracted thousands of visitors a day, SiteGround has you covered.
If you’re a newbie to the online world, and you need an affordable start-up plan, then try the SiteGround “StartUp Plan,” designed for sites that expect less than 10,000 visitors per month. This entry-level product, priced at $3.95, is excellent value – but the more expensive of the two options.
With this package, you get 24/7 tech support, a free web-builder, and free CMS install with free daily backups, SSD storage, and unlimited email accounts. It’s the ideal starter pack for anyone looking to take their idea for a website and make it a reality.
FastComet also has a diverse subscription offering, with packages to suit users at multiple levels as well.
FastComets starter package, called the “StartSmart Plan,” is a dollar cheaper than the SiteGround entry package, and it comes with a lifetime domain, unmetered traffic to your site, and 15GB of SSD storage space. With this starter package, you can only host one website, but all the other features are similar to SiteGround.
If you want multiple sites with FastComet, and 25GB of storage, then you may want to consider the “ScaleRight Plan,” which includes other features such as a free private DNS, three free site transfers, 1-Click Restore Manager, and unlimited add-on domains. You get all of this for the price of $5.95.
The SiteGround middle-tier package, “The GrowBig Plan,” is available for a monthly subscription fee of $6.45, and it allows you to host unlimited sites.
Both of these middle-tier packages on offer from SiteGround and FastComet offer the best performance and value for multiple sites with average traffic or one site with large volumes of daily visitors.
The “GoGeek Plan” from SiteGround, suits e-commerce retailers and sites experiencing massive traffic volumes. The plan allows customers to share fewer resources, ensuring better performance of your website. With 30GB of space, unlimited websites, and 100,000 monthly visitors, along with a host of additional value add-ons, you pay $11.95 per month.
FastComets “SpeedUp Plan,” offers webmasters 35GB of SSD storage space, on top of all of the other features in the “ScaleRight.” SpeedUp also comes with three times the CPU and RAM power of the standard package, as well as far fewer clients accessing the server, and Opcode and APC cache, all for only $9.95 per month.
The Bottom Line
Both FastComet and SiteGround offer tremendously competitive packages, and either one is a great deal. Your choice of subscription package depends on what you want to achieve with your online business and the day-to-day server demands on handling your traffic.
If you’re starting your business, then we like the lower cost of the FastComet package and the additional features like the unmetered traffic and lifetime domain. However, the extra dollar on SiteGround package is not a real concern.
Those mid-level users and light e-commerce retailers may benefit from the mid-tier plans on offer by both companies. By this stage, your concern should be growth – not price. Looking at the costs associated with both options, SiteGround is 50-cents more expensive on the monthly subscription fee – hardly worth writing home about those savings.
The top-level plan is where we see the difference in what’s on offer between SiteGround and FastComet. There’s a $2 separation between the two, and we think that FastComets offering is better than the SiteGround pricing, especially considering the additional storage space.
Reliability and Performance Comparison
Both SiteGround and FastComet have an innovative approach to the business of web hosting. However, SiteGround has a more extensive history, stretching back to its launch in 2004. FastComet only incorporated in 2011, and they decided to step into the web hosting game in 2013.
SiteGround is well known for its performance and reliability, with plenty of additional value-added features available on their premium plan. Their SuperCacher and free CDN by Cloudfare are class-leading, with NGINX web server tech and SSD drives that provide their customers with excellent performance at all hours.
However, FastComet does offer similar services and features, and they have SSD drives in their servers as well. The most significant difference between the two companies is that SiteGround charges $2 more on their monthly fee for 5GB less SSD storage space.
The Bottom Line
Both companies offer exceptional performance from their platforms, with the best hardware and software solutions available in hosting technology. Considering SSD storage is at a premium over most other hosting companies that still use HDD, we think the FastComet offering is very competitive.
Almost every web hosting firm that we see advertise their services, claim that they offer a 99.99-percent uptime rate. However, go through the terms and conditions, and you’ll find clauses that let them get out of these claims.
Since you can’t rely on marketing material, we went ahead and tested the uptime for both providers and measured the results.
SiteGround boasted results that were in line with their promises, and we never experienced any drop in uptime of less than 99.99-percent.
However, FastComet did not meet up to their claims, with an average uptime rate of 99.98-percent. While 0.01-percent is hardly a difference to concern any webmaster, the fact is that the SiteGround servers are that little bit quicker.
The Bottom Line
While both companies offer acceptable uptime rates, SiteGround is faster. Even though it’s only by a hair of a second, that tells us that they are using superior technology – or their employees manage their systems better than the competition. In this case, we have to go with SiteGround as the better choice in this category.
Server Response Time
One of the most crucial metrics we test when choosing a web host is the server response time. This test provides us with a clear indication of the performance and technology used in the servers. Loading time is what we are looking for with this test.
We kept things even in our test and used the same website for both SiteGround and FastComet. The site is a WordPress installation, with a custom theme a few images and five pages in total – nothing that we would consider outrageous. For our test, we disable all caching systems and plugins.
Running the test ion SiteGround, we found that they gave an average response time of 515 ms, stable up to 99 users, which is what we expect from this market-leading hosting company.
With FastComet, our expectations did not do as well. Initially, for the first 25 concurrent users, we received speeds of 471 ms. However, after that, the performance tapers off significantly, reaching as low as 36 seconds by the time we got to 40-concurrent users.
The Bottom Line
It’s clear that SiteGround is the winner in this category. The stable connection to 99-concurrent users is far superior to the slower speeds on offer with FastComet. This performance furthers our suspicion that the company is either using inferior technology, they have larger shared systems than we think, and their team is not as experienced and qualified as SiteGround.
Slow loading time on your site says plenty about your web host. Therefore, we recommend that if you’re starting an online venture and expect lower volumes of traffic in your early days, FastComet may be a viable option. However, if you intend on growing your business quickly, then You’ll need SiteGround to handle your scaling efficiently.
When it comes to comparing customer support, the difference between choosing SiteGround or FastComet is hard to determine. Both companies handle support queries efficiently and timeously.
When it comes to reaching out to the web host, SiteGround has far more ways to get in touch. They offer a toll number, ticketing system, and a 24/7/365-day live chat.
We found that the immediate response time of the live chat to be impressive, and we never waited over 5-seconds for a consultant to get on the conversation with us. With other live chats, we have found ourselves still waiting for a consultant after 10-minutes in some cases.
The SiteGround ticketing system also operates efficiently, and we got a reply to our ticket in less than 10-minutes.
SiteGround also allows you to view the profiles of all of their support staff, so you know whom you are dealing with, it’s not vital to the process, but we feel it’s a nice touch to bridge the gap between remote support consultants and their clients.
FastComet also states they offer 24/7 support. However, they only provide a ticketing system and 24-hour live chat. While this may be less functionality than SiteGround, we think its more than enough to get the job done.
FastComets results were almost identical in response times for the live chat and ticketing system, measuring in at 5-seconds and 9-minutes respectively. We found the consultants to be friendly, and they resolved our issue in less than 180-seconds.
The Bottom Line
Choosing FastComet or SiteGround in this category is tough since we rely on the live chat for resolving all of our queries, and both had similar results. However, we are going to give this one to SiteGround for the additional toll number and information on their consultants.
Both FastComet and SiteGround have excellent user-interfaces. It’s easy to navigate both cPanels, but FastComet has a slight edge by introducing the Softaculous software. We found that both providers offer a user-friendly interface that does not leave you confused about any functions or features on the platform.
SiteGround or Fast Comet – it’s a tough choice in this category since both companies offer their customers a comprehensive range of one-click installers for Weebly, WordPress, and Joomla.
The Bottom Line
We call this one a tie – but if pressed for a winner, we would say that FastComet has a slight edge in this category.
SiteGround vs FastComet – Our Pick
Selecting a web host is a time-consuming task that can leave you with a headache. By now, you should have a clear understanding of what’s on offer from both companies. In our Battle of SiteGround vs FastComet, there can be only one winner – So, who will it be?
The winner is – SiteGround.
In case you’re joining us from the introduction and missed the details of the review, here’s a quick breakdown of why we think SiteGround is the superior web host.
- Faster loading times for your website.
That’s it, at the end of the day, paying a few bucks extra on your monthly subscription fee is well worth the additional speed in loading time, and the consistency of the connection when traffic volume picks up is far better with SiteGround.
Forget about all the other bells and whistles involved with these providers, and choose the vendor that gives your website superior speed and a competitive edge in the marketplace.