COMPARISON 2 minutes

Media Temple vs. Bluehost

Last updated:
Author Scott Whatley

BlueHost and Media Temple are significantly different hosting services. Sure, they both aim to host websites, but the latter’s features and service quality far outweigh those of the former. If you want to be fair about it, the BlueHost vs. Media Temple competition can only be judged in terms of WordPress hosting, at which they both excel.

Media Temple is designed for the B2B market. Their outstanding grid network of shared hosting services is difficult to outperform and they’re considered to be the industry benchmark in terms of reliability. To put it briefly, MT’s top tier plan manages your entire cloud architecture for you with the help of AWS, but, in exchange, you have to pay a steep price. If that’s not a problem, they might be the best choice for you.

If I just want to create and host a basic website, though, I’d rather pay 10x less than Media Temple’s lowest subscription and have it taken care of by BlueHost. I’m not looking to launch a Fortune 500 company; I just want to get online. With that in mind, I wouldn’t think of choosing BlueHost or Media Temple. The former always has the upper hand in this particular situation.

BlueHostMedia Temple
Pricingfrom $29.99/monthfrom $30/month
Free DomainYesNo
SSD StorageYESYes
IP Address20
Uptime offer10.99
SSL CertificateNoYes
24/7 SupportYesYes
Email AccountsUnlimited1000
Ideal forSmall to Medium EnterpriseWeb and Media Websites

Media Temple vs Bluehost Conclusion

As you can see, BlueHost and Media Temple are playing in different leagues. We’re talking about juniors and pros, here. MT offers an outstanding hosting standard, but I’d classify it as overkill if I used it for anything less than an agile, fast-growing enterprise.

Leave a reply
Comment policy: We love comments and appreciate the time that readers spend to share ideas and give feedback. However, all comments are manually moderated and those deemed to be spam or solely promotional will be deleted.